Ready-to-use prompt

Make important business decisions with a clear framework.

Define the real decision, compare realistic alternatives, challenge assumptions and understand what could change the recommendation before committing resources.

KRIYANO MASTER PROMPTBusiness Decision Framework.
Act as an experienced business strategist, commercial analyst and management decision advisor.

TASK:
Analyze the business decision below and recommend a practical course of action.

The goal is to help management make a structured decision using objectives, evidence, constraints, alternatives, financial considerations, risks, trade-offs, reversibility and implementation requirements.

Do not invent market data, costs, revenues, probabilities, customer behavior, competitor information, legal requirements or business facts.

Clearly distinguish between:

- confirmed facts
- calculated values
- assumptions
- estimates supplied by the user
- hypotheses
- unknowns requiring validation

BUSINESS:
[Business / organization.]

DECISION:
[Clearly describe the decision that needs to be made.]

WHY THIS DECISION IS NEEDED:
[Problem, opportunity or trigger.]

OBJECTIVE:
[What outcome should the decision achieve?]

OPTIONS ALREADY CONSIDERED:
[List known alternatives.]

CURRENT SITUATION:
[Relevant background.]

CUSTOMERS / STAKEHOLDERS:
[Who will be affected?]

FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
[Costs, revenue, budget, margin, investment, etc. if known.]

OPERATIONAL INFORMATION:
[Processes, people, systems, capacity, suppliers, etc.]

MARKET INFORMATION:
[Known demand, competitors, trends or alternatives.]

TIME CONSTRAINT:
[Decision deadline or implementation window.]

RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS:
[Budget, people, systems, expertise, etc.]

LEGAL / CONTRACTUAL CONSTRAINTS:
[Known requirements only.]

RISK TOLERANCE:
[If known.]

SUCCESS CRITERIA:
[How will success be judged?]

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:
[Any additional instructions.]

BUSINESS DECISION ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS:

1. DEFINE THE DECISION
Rewrite the decision as one clear question.

Example:

"Should the business outsource delivery or continue managing delivery internally?"

Avoid vague questions such as:

"What should we do?"

2. IDENTIFY THE DECISION TYPE
Classify the decision where useful:

Strategic
Financial
Operational
Commercial
Technology
People
Supplier
Investment
Expansion
Product
Customer
Risk

3. DEFINE THE OBJECTIVE
State:

Primary objective
Secondary objectives
Desired outcome

Do not assume profit is always the only objective.

4. DEFINE SUCCESS
Identify how management will know whether the decision worked.

Use supplied metrics where available.

Do not invent targets.

5. REVIEW THE EVIDENCE
Classify inputs as:

CONFIRMED
Supported by supplied information.

CALCULATED
Derived mathematically from confirmed inputs.

ASSUMPTION
Believed but not verified.

HYPOTHESIS
Needs testing.

UNKNOWN
Important information missing.

6. IDENTIFY HARD CONSTRAINTS
Hard constraints cannot reasonably be violated.

Examples:

Available budget
Contract requirement
Legal requirement
Physical capacity
Deadline
Technical compatibility

Do not treat preferences as hard constraints.

7. IDENTIFY PREFERENCES
Separate desirable characteristics from mandatory requirements.

Examples:

Lower cost
Faster implementation
More flexibility
Better customer experience

8. IDENTIFY DECISION CRITERIA
Possible criteria include:

Cost
Profitability
Revenue potential
Customer impact
Quality
Speed
Operational complexity
Strategic fit
Scalability
Risk
Flexibility
Resource requirement
Implementation difficulty
Time-to-value

Use only relevant criteria.

9. PRIORITIZE CRITERIA
Classify criteria as:

Critical
Important
Useful

Avoid treating every criterion equally.

10. WEIGHT CRITERIA
Where useful assign percentage weights totaling 100%.

Explain the reasoning.

If weights are inferred, clearly state:

"Provisional weighting for discussion."

Do not present inferred weights as management-approved priorities.

11. IDENTIFY ALL REALISTIC OPTIONS
Include:

User-provided alternatives
Reasonable additional alternatives
Status quo / do nothing
Pilot / limited implementation
Hybrid approach

where relevant.

12. DO NOT FORCE BINARY DECISIONS
If the choice appears to be A vs B, check whether:

Partial implementation
Phased implementation
Hybrid model
Temporary solution

could be legitimate alternatives.

13. INCLUDE THE STATUS QUO
Explain what happens if the business makes no change.

The status quo should be evaluated rather than assumed to be risk-free.

14. DEFINE EACH OPTION
For every option describe:

What it involves
Resources required
Major dependency
Expected benefit
Major drawback

15. CHECK OPTION FEASIBILITY
Before scoring an option verify whether it satisfies hard constraints.

Mark:

Feasible
Conditionally feasible
Not currently feasible

16. DISQUALIFY WHEN NECESSARY
An option that violates a critical constraint should not win merely because its weighted score is high.

17. IDENTIFY INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
For each option identify what must be known before a reliable decision can be made.

18. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Where data exists evaluate:

Initial investment
Recurring cost
Operating cost
Revenue impact
Cost savings
Contribution
Cash-flow impact

Do not invent missing numbers.

19. CALCULATE TOTAL COST
Where relevant:

Total Cost =
Initial Cost + Recurring Cost + Operating Cost + Other Relevant Costs

State the period being analyzed.

20. ROI
Calculate only when sufficient data exists.

ROI % =
(Net Benefit / Investment) × 100

Show inputs.

21. PAYBACK PERIOD
Where cash benefits are reasonably known:

Payback Period =
Initial Investment / Periodic Net Benefit

State assumptions.

22. BREAK-EVEN
Where relevant calculate the volume or time required to recover costs.

Do not calculate without adequate inputs.

23. NPV
For significant long-term investments, mention NPV where appropriate.

Only calculate when:

Cash flows
Time periods
Discount rate

are supplied or explicitly assumed.

24. AVOID FAKE FINANCIAL PRECISION
Do not invent:

Revenue growth
Cost savings
Conversion improvements
Market share
ROI

25. USE SCENARIOS
Where outcomes are uncertain, consider:

Favorable scenario
Base scenario
Adverse scenario

Do not assign probabilities unless evidence supports them.

26. CUSTOMER IMPACT
For each option assess:

Customer value
Experience
Price
Availability
Quality
Service
Trust

Use available evidence.

27. EMPLOYEE / TEAM IMPACT
Consider:

Workload
Skills
Training
Roles
Change effort
Capacity

Do not invent employee sentiment.

28. OPERATIONAL IMPACT
Assess:

Process
Capacity
Lead time
Quality
Inventory
Systems
Suppliers
Service level
Complexity

29. TECHNOLOGY IMPACT
Where relevant assess:

Compatibility
Integration
Security
Data
Maintenance
Vendor dependency
Scalability

30. SUPPLIER IMPACT
Where relevant consider:

Availability
Lead time
Quality
Contract
Dependency
Alternative supply

31. STRATEGIC FIT
Ask:

Does the option support the business direction?
Does it strengthen an important capability?
Does it distract from core priorities?
Does it create useful future options?

32. CAPABILITY FIT
Assess whether the organization has:

People
Skills
Technology
Process
Management capacity
Funding

needed to execute the option.

33. OPPORTUNITY COST
For each major option ask:

What else could the business do with the same:

Money
Time
People
Management attention
Capacity?

34. IDENTIFY RISKS
For every option identify material:

Financial
Operational
Customer
Strategic
Technology
Supplier
People
Compliance

risks.

35. ASSESS RISK QUALITATIVELY
Use:

Low
Medium
High

unless reliable quantitative data exists.

36. DO NOT INVENT PROBABILITIES
Do not state:

"70% chance of success"

without supporting data.

37. IDENTIFY RISK MITIGATION
For major risks provide practical mitigation.

38. IDENTIFY RESIDUAL RISK
Explain what important risk remains after mitigation.

39. IDENTIFY DEPENDENCIES
For each option identify major dependencies such as:

Supplier
Technology
Approval
Funding
Recruitment
Customer adoption
Data
Contract
Training

40. IDENTIFY ASSUMPTIONS
For each material assumption provide:

Assumption
Why it matters
Confidence
Validation method
Impact if wrong

41. IDENTIFY CRITICAL ASSUMPTIONS
Prioritize assumptions capable of changing the recommended option.

42. ASSESS REVERSIBILITY
Classify each option:

Highly reversible
Partially reversible
Difficult to reverse

43. ASSESS COMMITMENT
Consider:

Capital commitment
Contract commitment
People commitment
Technology lock-in
Customer commitment

44. ASSESS FLEXIBILITY
Identify whether the option preserves future choices.

45. IDENTIFY EXIT COST
Where relevant consider:

Cancellation
Migration
Write-off
Contract termination
Retraining
Customer disruption

Do not invent amounts.

46. ASSESS TIME-TO-VALUE
Estimate qualitatively when numerical evidence is unavailable.

Use:

Short
Medium
Long

Explain the basis.

47. ASSESS IMPLEMENTATION COMPLEXITY
Consider:

Number of teams
Technology
Process change
Training
Supplier dependency
Approval
Customer migration

48. CREATE A DECISION MATRIX
For feasible options create:

Criterion
Weight
Option score
Weighted score
Rationale

Use a simple scale such as 1–5.

49. EXPLAIN THE SCORE
Every important score should have a reason.

Do not create arbitrary numbers merely to make the table look analytical.

50. LABEL PROVISIONAL SCORES
If evidence is incomplete, state that scoring is provisional.

51. DO NOT LET THE MATRIX OVERRIDE REALITY
A mathematical winner should not override:

Hard constraints
Critical risk
Missing evidence
Legal requirement
Safety requirement
Strategic incompatibility

52. PERFORM SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Test whether the recommendation changes if:

Cost becomes more important
Risk becomes more important
Speed becomes more important
A major assumption changes

53. IDENTIFY DECISION DRIVERS
Explain which 2–4 factors most strongly determine the result.

54. IDENTIFY DECISION BREAKERS
State what evidence or event could reverse the recommendation.

55. COMPARE BEST AND SECOND-BEST
Explain why the recommended option is stronger than the nearest alternative.

56. EXPLAIN WHY NOT THE OTHERS
For each rejected major option give the main reason.

57. CONSIDER A PILOT
Where uncertainty is significant, determine whether the decision can be tested through:

Pilot
Prototype
Trial
Limited region
Small customer group
Single department
Temporary contract

58. DEFINE PILOT OBJECTIVE
State what uncertainty the pilot should resolve.

59. DEFINE PILOT SUCCESS MEASURES
Use supplied baselines or measurable outcomes.

Do not invent arbitrary targets.

60. DEFINE STOP CONDITIONS
Identify conditions under which the pilot should be:

Stopped
Adjusted
Expanded

Avoid unsupported numeric thresholds.

61. IDENTIFY INFORMATION VALUE
Ask:

Which missing information would most improve decision confidence?

Prioritize research accordingly.

62. AVOID ANALYSIS PARALYSIS
Not every unknown requires research.

Focus on uncertainties capable of changing the decision.

63. DISTINGUISH REVERSIBLE VS IRREVERSIBLE DECISIONS
For highly reversible decisions, faster experimentation may be appropriate.

For difficult-to-reverse decisions, stronger evidence may be required.

64. IDENTIFY REGRET RISK
Ask:

Which option would management most regret choosing if the key assumption proves wrong?

Use this as supporting analysis, not the only decision rule.

65. CONSIDER DOWNSIDE PROTECTION
Identify how the business can limit losses while preserving potential upside.

66. CONSIDER OPTIONALITY
Prefer options that preserve useful future choices when uncertainty is high, where commercially reasonable.

67. CONSIDER SECOND-ORDER EFFECTS
Ask what could happen after the immediate effect.

Example:

Outsourcing reduces internal workload
→ dependency on supplier increases
→ internal capability declines.

68. IDENTIFY UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
For each major option consider:

Customer behavior
Employee workload
Supplier dependency
Process complexity
Cost shifting
Quality
Future flexibility

69. CHECK FOR BIAS
Challenge:

Confirmation bias
Sunk-cost fallacy
Status-quo bias
Overconfidence
Recency bias
Competitor imitation
Fear of change

70. SUNK COST
Costs already incurred should not automatically justify continuing a poor option.

Distinguish sunk costs from future costs.

71. STATUS-QUO BIAS
Do not assume no change is safer.

Identify the risk of inaction.

72. ACTION BIAS
Do not assume making a change is automatically better than maintaining the current approach.

73. COMPETITOR BIAS
Do not copy competitors without checking strategic fit.

74. CONFIRMATION BIAS
Actively identify evidence that could contradict the preferred option.

75. PRE-MORTEM
For the recommended option ask:

"Imagine this decision failed badly. What were the most plausible reasons?"

Use the result to strengthen mitigation.

76. RED-TEAM THE RECOMMENDATION
Present the strongest argument against the recommended option.

77. IDENTIFY NO-REGRET ACTIONS
List actions worth doing regardless of which final option is selected.

78. IDENTIFY DECISION DEADLINE
Use the supplied deadline.

If unknown state:

"Decision timing to be established."

79. IDENTIFY COST OF DELAY
Where evidence exists assess whether delaying the decision creates:

Lost revenue
Higher cost
Customer impact
Capacity problem
Risk exposure
Lost opportunity

Do not invent values.

80. IDENTIFY APPROVAL NEEDS
Determine which decisions may require:

Management
Finance
Legal
IT
Operations
Customer
Supplier

approval.

Do not invent company authority structures.

81. IDENTIFY STAKEHOLDERS
For each major stakeholder identify:

Interest
Impact
Input needed
Communication need

82. IDENTIFY DECISION OWNER
Use the supplied role.

If unknown state:

"Decision owner to be assigned."

83. IDENTIFY IMPLEMENTATION OWNER
Decision owner and implementation owner may differ.

84. DEFINE IMPLEMENTATION PHASES
Where appropriate:

Validate
Approve
Prepare
Pilot
Implement
Monitor
Review

85. DEFINE FIRST ACTIONS
List the first 3–5 concrete actions following the decision.

86. DEFINE SUCCESS MEASURES
For implementation provide:

Metric
Baseline
Target
Data source
Review point

If baseline or target is unknown, mark it as needing establishment.

87. DEFINE LEADING INDICATORS
Where useful identify early indicators that implementation is progressing.

88. DEFINE LAGGING INDICATORS
Identify final business outcomes where relevant.

89. DEFINE REVIEW POINT
Recommend a formal decision review after enough evidence becomes available.

Do not invent a date when none is supplied.

90. DOCUMENT THE DECISION
Create a concise decision record containing:

Decision
Date
Owner
Options considered
Key criteria
Evidence
Assumptions
Risks
Reason
Review trigger

Use placeholders for unknown date or owner.

91. IDENTIFY CONDITIONS FOR REVERSAL
State what would justify revisiting the decision.

92. IDENTIFY CONDITIONS FOR EXPANSION
For phased decisions, explain what evidence would justify scaling.

93. IDENTIFY CONDITIONS FOR PAUSE
Explain what warning signs should cause management to stop and review.

94. MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Provide:

Decision
Recommended option
Main reason
Major benefit
Major risk
Critical assumption
Required management action

95. EXECUTIVE VERSION
Create a concise decision brief suitable for senior management.

96. CONFIDENCE LEVEL
Rate recommendation confidence:

High
Medium
Low

based on:

Evidence quality
Assumption sensitivity
Risk
Option difference
Missing information

97. EXPLAIN CONFIDENCE
Do not give a confidence label without explaining why.

98. IDENTIFY NEXT RESEARCH PRIORITIES
Rank:

P1 — Could change the decision
P2 — Important
P3 — Useful

99. FINAL RECOMMENDATION
State clearly:

Recommended option
Why
Conditions
Risks
What should happen next

Avoid vague conclusions such as:

"It depends."

If evidence is insufficient for a final choice, recommend the specific validation action required before deciding.

100. FINAL QUALITY CHECK
Before completing verify:

- the decision question is clear
- realistic alternatives were considered
- status quo was included where relevant
- hard constraints were respected
- facts and assumptions are separated
- financial values were not invented
- probabilities were not invented
- risks and residual risks are visible
- opportunity cost was considered
- reversibility was considered
- decision matrix scores are explained
- sensitivity was tested
- strongest counterargument was considered
- recommendation is actionable
- conditions that could change the recommendation are visible
- implementation and review are included

OUTPUT FORMAT:

1. Decision Statement
2. Objective & Success Criteria
3. Evidence Review
4. Constraints
5. Decision Criteria
6. Options Considered
7. Feasibility Check
8. Financial Analysis — if possible
9. Customer / Stakeholder Impact
10. Operational Impact
11. Risk Analysis
12. Assumptions & Unknowns
13. Decision Matrix
14. Sensitivity Analysis
15. Option Comparison
16. Strongest Argument Against the Recommendation
17. Recommended Option
18. Why the Other Options Were Not Selected
19. Conditions That Could Change the Decision
20. Pilot / Validation Plan — if appropriate
21. Implementation Plan
22. Success Measures
23. Decision Review Triggers
24. Decision Record
25. Executive Summary
26. Confidence Level
27. Immediate Next Actions

IMPORTANT:
- Do not invent financial values, market facts, probabilities, competitor information or customer behavior.
- Separate confirmed evidence from assumptions.
- Include the status quo where it is a legitimate alternative.
- Do not force a binary choice when phased or hybrid options exist.
- Hard constraints override weighted scoring.
- Explain all important decision-matrix scores.
- Treat inferred weights and scores as provisional.
- Consider opportunity cost, reversibility and the cost of inaction.
- Identify the strongest argument against the recommendation.
- Do not allow sunk costs or competitor behavior to determine the decision automatically.
- Recommend validation when a critical unknown could change the outcome.
- Make the final recommendation clear, conditional where necessary and actionable.
Prompt copied to clipboard.
How to use it

Use the prompt effectively.

01

Frame the real decision

Turn a vague business question into a clear choice with a defined objective, success criteria, hard constraints and realistic alternatives.

02

Compare options systematically

Evaluate financial, customer, operational, strategic and risk implications using transparent criteria instead of choosing the option that initially feels most attractive.

03

Challenge the preferred answer

Test assumptions, sensitivity, opportunity cost, reversibility and the strongest counterargument before treating one option as the winner.

04

Turn the decision into execution

Define validation, implementation, success measures and review triggers so management can determine whether the decision actually produced the expected result.

Example

Evaluate a business decision without pretending missing evidence is known.

Example input

Decision: Should a small online retailer continue packing orders internally or outsource fulfillment?

Objective: Support growth without reducing customer service quality.

Known issue: Internal order volume is increasing.

Known constraint: The business has limited warehouse space.

Outsourcing information: A fulfillment provider is available, but final pricing and service performance have not yet been verified.

Unknown: Future order volume, full outsourcing cost, service-level performance and customer impact.

Possible output

Decision statement: Should the retailer retain internal fulfillment, outsource it, or test a hybrid model to support growth while maintaining service quality?

Hard constraint: Available warehouse space is limited, making continued internal growth potentially difficult without additional capacity.

Critical unknown: Outsourcing should not be selected based on assumed cost savings because complete provider pricing and service-performance evidence are not yet available.

Alternative worth testing: A limited fulfillment pilot may provide stronger evidence than immediately transferring all operations.

Decision driver: The choice depends heavily on total fulfillment economics, required capacity, service reliability and the business's expected order volume.

Recommended next action: Obtain a complete provider cost structure and service commitments, compare them against current internal fulfillment economics and test performance with a controlled order segment if commercially practical.

Improve the result

Make decisions that remain defensible when assumptions change.

01

Don't force an A-or-B choice

Many business decisions have a third option: pilot, hybrid, phased implementation or maintaining the status quo temporarily while gathering better evidence.

02

Hard constraints beat the score

A decision matrix can organize judgment, but an option that violates a critical legal, financial, technical or operational constraint should not win because its weighted total is higher.

03

Ask what could reverse the decision

A useful recommendation explains not only why one option is preferred, but also which assumption, risk or new evidence would justify changing course.